The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963-1965: Genocide, History, and the Limits of the LawCambridge University Press, 8. 3. 2010. - 340 страница The Frankfurt Auschwitz trial was the largest, most public, and most important trial of Holocaust perpetrators conducted in West German courts. Drawing on a wide range of archival sources, Devin O. Pendas provides a comprehensive history of this momentous event. Situating the trial in a thorough analysis of West German criminal law, the book argues that in confronting systematic, state-sponsored genocide, the Frankfurt court ran up against the limits of law. This book also provides a compelling account of the divided response to the trial among the West German public. |
Из књиге
Резултати 1-3 од 71
Страница 65
... question of whether a wife who neglects to prevent her husband's suicide could be punished as a perpetrator , since accomplices to suicide were not subject to criminal sanctions . The court ruled that a person with a legal obli- gation ...
... question of whether a wife who neglects to prevent her husband's suicide could be punished as a perpetrator , since accomplices to suicide were not subject to criminal sanctions . The court ruled that a person with a legal obli- gation ...
Страница 106
... question of punishment was inseparable from the representational question of mastering Germany's past . At the same time , even here the indictment retained its character as a legal document , concerned with providing only such ...
... question of punishment was inseparable from the representational question of mastering Germany's past . At the same time , even here the indictment retained its character as a legal document , concerned with providing only such ...
Страница 216
... question was not what functional role the defendants were supposed to have played in Auschwitz . Rather , the question was , " Where is their personal contribution to the act , where is their personal guilt , where did they do more than ...
... question was not what functional role the defendants were supposed to have played in Auschwitz . Rather , the question was , " Where is their personal contribution to the act , where is their personal guilt , where did they do more than ...
Садржај
Prelude | 24 |
Motivation Action | 53 |
The Trial Actors | 80 |
Ауторска права | |
други делови (9) нису приказани
Друга издања - Прикажи све
Чести термини и фразе
Accessory to Mord accomplice accused actions argued Auschwitz-Prozeß Boger charges civil counsel claim concentration camp context convicted December December 21 decision defendants defense attorneys Deutschland evidence extermination fact Federal Republic FFStA 4 Ks Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial Frankfurter Rundschau Fritz Bauer gas chambers genocide German courts German criminal German law Großmann guilt Hofmeyer Holocaust Ibid IG Farben indictment individual inmates investigation Jews judges juridical justice Kaduk Kaul Kaul's killing Klehr Kuczynski Langbein Laternser Laternser's motives Mulka Munich murder Nachlaß Kaul Naumann Nazi crimes Nazi past Nazi trials Nazism Neue NS-Verbrechen Nuremberg Oberscharführer orders Ormond participants particular perpetrators perpetratorship Plädoyer political prosecution prosecution's prosecutor's office prosecutors punishment question Rechtsstaat Robert Mulka Rögner role Roxin specific Stuttgart survivors tactical testified testimony Third Reich tion truth Ulrich Herbert University Press verdict Vergangenheitsbewältigung Verlag Vermerk victims Vogel Waffen SS West German Wilhelm Boger witnesses Wojak