Page. 83 EXPENDITURES OF THE COMMISSION. EXPENSES, OPERATING. EXPORT RATES.. from points east and west of the Mississippi River, re. on wheat and flour.... EXPORT TRADE OF BOSTON, RE.. EXPRESS COMPANIES.. 55, 57, 60 11-16, 96, 211, 237 211 96 EXTRACTS FROM FOURTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF COMMISSION. 102, 237 FACILITIES OF TRAFFIC 19, 20, 22, 36-38, 44, 45, 46, 237 FALLING FROM TRAINS AND ENGINES, CASUALTIES RESULTING FROM. 58, 65 FARGO, N. DAK 51 FARRAR & Co. v. EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA R. COMPANY FINAL REPORT OF STATISTICS OF RAILWAYS FOR YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1900.. 52-59, 297 Milwaukee Chamber of Commerce v.. FITCHBURG R. Co., RE Michigan Box Company . FLORENCE R. Co., SOUTH CAROLINA R. COMMISSION V. FLORIDA CENTRAL AND PENINSULAR R. Co., PERRY v.. FLORIDA R. COMMISSION v. SAVANNAH, FLORIDA AND WESTERN R. Co.. FOOD PRODUCTS 186 179 120 206 157 154, 158 11-16, 238, 250 238 FORT WORTH AND DENVER CITY R. Co., CATTLE RAISERS' ASSOCIATION OF 27, 28 FRANK, DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN R. Co. v. FREE CARTAGE OF FREIGHT. FREEMAN v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R. Co. FREE PASSES AND FREE TRANSPORTATION. FREIGHT Cars. Carried.. Classification continuous carriage of free cartage of.. locomotives. misrepresentation of. misrouting. perishable 43-45 48 238 238 194 238 238 52, 53 53, 54, 55 19, 20, 21, 38, 39, 52, 233, 249 234 238 52, 53 20 245 242 FREIGHT BUREAU OF THE CINCINNATI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE T. CINCINNATI, FREMONT, ELKHORN AND MISSOURI VALLEY R. Co., RE.. 247 249 175 178 FRUIT 19, 20 FULTON v. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND OMAHA R. Co. 97 GEORGIA RAILROAD COMMISSION v. CLYDE STEAMSHIP CO. GERKE BREWING Co. v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R. Co. GIBBONS v. Ogden. 40, 41, 163 GLENOCHIL, THE. GRAB IRONS GRAIN. GRAIN SHIPPERS' ASSOCIATION OF NORTHWEST IOWA v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL R. Co. Detroit Board of Trade v. McMorran v re investigation of acts and doings.. GRAND TRUNK WESTERN R. Co., LUNDQUIST V . GREAT NORTHERN R. Co.... Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce v.. re.. GREENLEAF, KANS. GRIFFEE v. BURLINGTON AND MISSOURI RIVER R. CO GRIFFIN, GA. 168 48 51 238 19, 20, 21, 238 210 116 127 123 43 26 167 193, 204 35 GROUP RATES.. GROSS EARNINGS. GUSTIN v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R. Co. v. Burlington and Missouri River R. Co v. Illinois Central R. Co HADDOCK V. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN R. Co HAMILTON & BROWN v. CHATTANOOGA, ROME AND COLUMBUS R. Co. HAMPTON BOARD OF TRADE v. Nashville, CHATTANOOGA AND ST. LOUIS HECK AND PETREE v. EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA R. Co... HOGS AND HOG PRODUCTS HOLBROOK v. ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND MANITOBA R. Co.. HOLDZKOM v. MICHIGAN CENTRAL R. Co HOLMES & Co. v. SOUTHERN R. Co... HOOD v. T. H. AND I. R. R.. Page. 25, 226 221, 222 HORNE, ATLANTA, KNOXVILLE AND NORTHERN R. Co. v.. 66 41, 42 27, 28 HOWELL v. NEW YORK, LAKE ERIE AND WESTERN R. Co 115 34 HUNTINGTON, OREG 46 HURLBURT 1. LAKE SHORE AND MICHIGAN SOUTHERN R. Co.. 112 IMPERIAL COAL COMPANY v. PITTSBURG AND LAKE ERIE R. Co.. INCOME ACCOUNT, COMPARATIVE, OF RAILWAYS OF THE UNITED STATES. Bonds from lease of road. INCREASE IN TONNAGE. INDEPENDENT REFINERS' ASSOCIATIONS v. Pennsylvania R. Co.. v. Western New York and Pennsylvania R. Co.. INDEX TO POINTS DECIDED BY THE COMMISSION INDIANA, DECATUR AND WESTERN R. Co., SUFFERN, HUNT & Co. v INDIANA 204 134 210 199 121 132 239 INDIANAPOLIS, IND.. 66 application to, for relief from the operation of the fourth section 20, 245 IS TRANSPORTATION PASSING THROUGH DIFFERENT STATES, BUT BEGINNING AND JACKSON, MICH.. JACKSON V. ST. LOUIS, ARKANSAS AND TEXAS R. Co.. 62-78 51 25 51 40 51 51 51 51 40, 51 51 40 20, 239 52, 67 95 47 20 99 JAMES & ABBOTT v. CANADIAN PACIFIC R. Co... v. East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia R. Co... 168 128 JAMES & MAYER BUGGY Co. v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC 153 JANNIN V. TEXAS.. 48 JEROME HILL COTTON COMPANY v. MISSOURI, KANSAS AND TEXAS R. Co.. 187 JOINT ARRANGEMENTS.. JOINT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION.. JOHNSTON-LARIMER DRY GOODS Co., ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R. Co. v JOINT RATES. JOINT TARIFFS AND SCHEDULES, RE- KANSAS RAILROAD COMMISSION v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R. Co... KENTUCKY AND INDIANA BRIDGE Co. v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R. Co.. 113 99 KINDEL: KENTUCKY RAILROAD COMMISSION v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R. Co v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO..... 199 223 22 KING & Co. v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN And Hartford R. Co LA CROSSE MANUFACTURERS AND JOBBERS' UNION v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE LA GRANGE LONG AND SHORT HAUL CASE... LAKE ERIE AND WESTERN R. Co., SOUTHERN PAINT AND GLASS COMPANY v .- LISTMAN MILL Co. v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL R. Co Page. 144 19, 20 107 41, 51 41 178 103 112 159 174 111 159 98 81 81 240 149 194 47 136 155 34 128 99 43-45 8-11 78 |