Слике страница
PDF
ePub

Chandler P. Anderson, New York, N. Y.

Philip Marshall Brown, Princeton University.

Charles Noble Gregory, Washington, D. C.

Amos S. Hershey, Indiana University.

David Jayne Hill, Washington, D. C.

Charles Cheney Hyde, Northwestern University.

Robert Lansing, Washington, D. C.

John Bassett Moore, Columbia University.

Jesse S. Reeves, University of Michigan.

George G. Wilson, Harvard University.

Theodore S. Woolsey, New Haven, Conn.

Editor-in-Chief

James Brown Scott, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,

Washington, D. C.

Secretary of the Board of Editors and Business Manager
George A. Finch, 2 Jackson Place, Washington, D. C.

The American Journal Of International Law is supplied to all members of the
American Society of International Law without extra charge, as the membership fee of
five dollars per annum includes the right to all issues of the Journal published during the
year for which the dues are paid. (Members residing in foreign countries pay one dollar
extra per annum for foreign postage.)

The annual subscription to non-members of the Society is five dollars per annum (one
dollar extra is charged for foreign postage) and should be placed with the American Society
of International Law, 2 Jackson Place, Washington, D. C.

Single copies of the Journal will be supplied by the Society at $1.25 per copy.

Applications for membership in the Society, correspondence with reference to the
Journal, and books for review should be sent to James Brown Scott, Editor-in-Chief,
2 Jackson Place, Washington, D. C.

Germany-united States. Agreement providing for the determination of the
amount of claims against Germany. August 10, 19SS 171

Permanent Court Of International Justice. Rules of Court:

Chapter I. The Court.

Heading 1. Constitution of the Court.

Section A. Judges and Assessors. Articles lto8 173

Section B. The Presidency. Articles 9 to 13 176

Section C. The Chambers. Articles 14 to 16 176

Section D. The Registry. Articles 17 to 26 177

Heading 2. Working of the Court. Articles 27 to 31 179

Chapter II. Procedure.

Heading 1. Contentious Procedure.

Section A. General Provisions. Articles 32 to 34 180

Section B. Procedure before the Court and before the special Chambers (Arti-

cles 26 and 27 of the Statute).

I. Institution of Proceedings. Articles 35 and 36 180

II. Written Proceedings. Articles 37 to 42 181

III. Oral Proceedings. Articles 43 to 66 182

IV. Interim Protection. Article 57 184

V. Intervention. Articles 58 to 60 184

VI. Agreement. Article 61 185

VII. Judgment. Articles 62 to 65 185

VIII. Revision. Article 66 186

Section C. Summary Procedure. Articles 67 to 70 187

Heading 2. Advisory Procedure. Articles 71 to 74 187

Heading 3. Errors. Article 75 188

Annex to Article 2. List of Judges and Deputy Judges 188

Annex to Article 14. Composition of the Chambers 189

Annex to Article 17. The Registrar of the Court 190

Annex to Article 24. Interviews with the Registrar 190

Address of the Court 190

Treaty Of Versailles:

Message of President Wilson to Congress transmitting an agreement, dated June

16, 1919, recommending the acceptance of special German reparation bonds in

satisfaction of Belgian obligations to France, Great Britain and the United

States 190

Protocol signed on behalf of Germany upon the deposit of ratifications. Jan. 10,

19X0 192

Note of Allied Powers to President of German Delegation respecting war crimi-

nals. May7,1920 195

Agreement between Allied Powers for the settlement of certain questions as to the

application of the treaties of peace and complementary agreements with Germany,

Austria, Hungary, and Bulgaria. Spa, July 16, 1980 197
Treaty Of VersaillesContinued.

AMERICAN "GOOD OFFICES" IN ASIA

By Tyler Dennett

The first article of the American treaty with China, June 18, 1858, reads:

There shall be, as there have always been, peace and friendship between the United States of America and the Ta Tsing Empire, and between their peoples, respectively. They shall not insult or oppress each other for any trifling cause, so as to produce an estrangement between them; and if any other nation should act unjustly or oppressively, the Vnited States will exert their good offices, on being informed of the case, to bring about an amicable arrangement of the question, thus showing their friendly feelings.

This solemn engagement, the clumsy language of which leaves open the inference that insults and oppressions are not prohibited if the cause is more than trifling, and also involves the United States, in offering good offices, in prejudgment of the case, appears in slightly different phraseology in Article 1 of the American treaty with Korea, signed May 22, 1882, at the mouth of the Salee River.

By these treaties, therefore, the United States assumed toward the two nations respectively, a peculiar relationship. No other treaty with China contained such a provision, and, while the other treaties of Korea with foreign powers substantially copied from the American treaty the provision for good offices, it was to the United States, as a thoroughly disinterested yet friendly power, that both Korea and China began to look in times of adversity. While no similar provision was included in any treaty between the United States and Japan, nevertheless, the very intimate and friendly relations of Japan with the United States served a similar purpose so that the United States for many years occupied towards Japan a position very similar.

Before tracing the subsequent actions of the government of the United States, in the fulfillment of this peculiar relation, it will be well to review the circumstances which led to the insertion of these clauses into the treaties.

The awkward phraseology of the clause in the treaty with China is accounted for by the fact that it was written by a secretary of the Chinese Commissioners.

The circumstances were tragic. For fourteen years the Chinese Empire had held the foreign powers at bay, limiting them to the five open ports, and treating their representatives as well as their subjects or citizens with very little respect. Meanwhile, the Empire had been torn with the greatest rebellion the world has ever known. At length England and France rose in wrath. Russia and the United States, while pledged to use only peaceful measures, were in entire agreement that the disdainful, conceited, exclusive policy of China must end. The English and the French occupied Canton, sailed north and reduced the Taku forts in the Pei-ho, and presented themselves at Tientsin with the threat that only the appearance of Chinese plenipotentiaries could prevent an advance upon Peking and upon the Emperor himself. The Russians and the Americans, whose negotiations with the Chinese had been interrupted by the battle of Taku, followed Lord Elgin and Baron Gros to Tientsin, and resumed the negotiations under circumstances made more favorable by the recent Chinese defeat.1

Lord Elgin was inexorable. Relentlessly he forced the Chinese Commissioners to retire from one contention after another until it seemed that they were about to sign away their sovereign rights. He demanded the right of diplomatic residence in Peking, and the opening of the Yangtse for trade; it was plain to the Chinese Commissioners that the troubles of China would be multiplied as the foreigners overran the Empire and the possible points of irritation were infinitely multiplied. While the Chinese were in this mood, the Americans brought the final draft of the American treaty to them for approval. A Chinese secretary seized his brush and wrote into the American treaty the clause to which our attention is called.*

The circumstances under which a similar clause was inserted into the American treaty with Korea were equally dramatic. The United States made its first effort to negotiate such a treaty in 1871.

Before approaching the government of the country directly, Mr. F. F. Low, the American Minister at Peking, had taken the matter up with the Chinese authorities in Peking, inviting their approval and good offices. This seemed important because of a somewhat evanescent claim to suzerainty over Korea which was asserted by China whenever it did not involve the assumption of any liability for Korean bad behavior. The expedition of 1871 failed utterly, and Mr. Low became convinced that this was in no small part due to the failure of the Chinese Government to give it a sincere approval.3

i Journal of 8. Wells Williams; Journal of the North-China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. XLH, 1011, p. 61; W. A. P. Martin, Cycle of Cathy, p. 185, gives a different and probably inaccurate account of the incident.

* For the details of the negotiations of William B. Reed, the American Minister, and 8. Wells Williams, the secretary of the legation, see Reed Correspondence, S. Ex. Doc. 30, 36-1; also the Williams Journal.

s William Elliot Griffis, Korea, the Hermit Nation, Chap. XLVI; Foreign Relations, 1871, p. 73, Low to Fish, Nov. 22, 1870; p. Ill, Low to Fish, Apr. 3, 1871; p. 116, Low to Fish, May 31, 1871; p. 121, Low to Fish, June 2, 1871; p. 124, Low to Fish, June 15, 1871; p. 142, Low to Fish, July 6, 1871.

« ПретходнаНастави »