sity of the class of 1893. The Judge by his scholarship and social disposition has always held the highest esteem of the Bar. In 1903, he was unanimously chosen President of the Oklahoma Bar Association, a position he filled with benefit to the Bar and credit to himself. Soon after the passage of the Enabling Act, he was made Chairman of the Democratic organization of the New State and all his efforts were crowned with political success. Later he was chosen a candidate for membership of the new Supreme Court and elected. Judge Dunn has not only the confidence of all that know him but the future promises him a most brilliant career. Hon. A. N. Munden, formerly of Seymour, Indiana, has located in Oklahoma City. Mr. Munden came to the new State principally on account of his health; but being an able lawyer and used to an active practice has opened an office and is rapidly securing a lucrative business. He came to the new state well indorsed by those who have known him well, and is a gentleman deserving the confidence of all. The Ohio State Bar Association will meet in annual session at Put-in-Bay, on July 8, 1908. WRITTEN OBJECTIONS.-There are cases in which, from rulings on the pleading or rulings on the evidence, the advocate will have reason to expect that the court will rule adversely to him upon objections to evidence. Where there is reasons to expect this, it is well to write objections in advance, with little comment deliver them to the court. There are cases where it is desirable to state and argue objections, even though they are cer tain to be overruled. But these are exceptional cases, seldom arising in actual practice. When the advocate is quite sure that the evidence he assails can be overcome, it is well enough to persistently object, since that will make it seem the more important, and when it falls the greater will be the impression produced by its downfall. Hon. Byron K. Elliott. "THE AMERICAN AND ENGLISH ANNOTATED Criminal Cases, 34, 116, 131, 184, 240, 277, 330, 375 and Difference between Indictments and Informations 129 Editorials, 40, 70, 120, 171, 210, 246, 281, 333, 375, Uniformity of Legislation Western Federal District Decision, ex parte Green 175, 213 253 265 Circuit Courts of the United States Reviews 37, 68, 118, 169, 208, 243, 279, 332, 381, 444, 489 and 548 Humor 42, 76, 251, 286, 337, 382, and 494 Latest Bankruptcy Cases 114, 134, 394 and 485. Current Decisions of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma: Anderson vs. Territory 94 Allen-Dudley Co. vs. Clevenger, et al. 108 C. R. I. & P. Ry Co. vs. Dodson, et al. 396 Citizens Bank of Wakita vs. Garnett, et al. 535 De Graffenreid, et al. vs. Iowa Land & M. Co. 406 Decisions Continued. Kaw City Mill vs. Purcell Mill Co. 100 Keel vs. N. Y. Life Insurance Co. 344 Laudenback vs. Territory Long-Bell Lumber Co. vs. Newell, et al. Metropolitan Ry Co. vs. Fonville 104 90 155 McIver vs. Williamson-Halsel-Frasier Co. 198 463 Territory ex rel City of Okla. vs. Robertson, et al. 145 Walcher vs. Territory 13 Wright vs. U. S. 19 |