Слике страница
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

body of good work which he has 200
left to us. With the ancients I will
not compare him. In many respects
the ancients are far above us, and
yet there is something that we demand
which they can never give. Leaving 205
the ancients, let us come to the poets
and poetry of Christendom. Dante,
Shakspere, Molière, Milton, Goethe,
are altogether larger and more splen-
did luminaries in the poetical heaven 210
than Wordsworth. But I know not
where else, among the moderns, we
are to find his superiors.

THOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY.

THOMAS BABINGTON MACAULAY

(1800-1859) was the son of a wellknown merchant and philanthropist of Scottish descent, and was born at his uncle's seat of Rothley Temple, in Leicestershire. While studying law at Cambridge, he devoted most of his time to literature, won several prizes for essays and poems, and, from 1823 on, wrote essays for the magazines, which at once arrested the attention of the public. The first public office he held was a Commissionership of Bankruptcy (1828-32). In 1830 he entered upon a political career, being elected M.P. for Calne, and subsequently, for several sessions, sat in the House of Commons, in which he became an eminent leader on the Whig side and soon made himself a name as a powerful and brilliant orator. Having shown a thorough knowledge of Indian affairs as Secretary to the Board of Control (1832), he was sent to India in 1834, and there, as member of the Supreme Council, took a leading part in the composition of the Indian Penal Code. After his return (1839), he began his famous History of England, which he often had temporarily to suspend for the sake of his parliamentary labours and his official duties as Secretary for War (1839-41) and Paymaster-General (184648). After the publication of the first volume of his History, which at once proved a marvellous success, honours crowded upon him, from England as well as from the Continent, and the year 1857 brought him a peerage. He died in London in his sixtieth year, leaving his great history unfinished.

Herrig-Förster, British Authors.

Macaulay was equally great as politician, orator, and writer. His literary fame is based on his Critical and Historical Essays, contributed to the 'Edinburgh Review' and collected in 1843, and on The History of England from the Accession of James II. (5 vols. 1848-61), which he finished only up to the death of William III. His Essays comprise English and foreign history (Sir William Temple, Lord Clive, Warren Hastings, Von Ranke's History of the Popes), biography (William Pitt), politics (Gladstone's State in its Relations with the Church) and literature (Bacon, Milton, Bunyan, Johnson), but are all more or less historical in principle. His History of England is unequalled in historical literature for a fascinating brilliant narrative power, which he had learned from Scott's Waverley novels. Moreover his marvellous constructive skill allowed him to introduce an abundance of minute details and sparkling illustrations without ever loosing his grasp on the reader's attention. On the other hand he is wanting in intellectual and moral depth, and is always writing with the strong partybias of the Whig politician, which not seldom impairs the truth of his pictures. Both the Essays and the History are written in a perfectly clear, forcible, and brilliant style, which has made him, apart from fiction, 'the most popular and widely read prose author of England.' His Speeches were collected in 1853. He has also written poetry, such as the Lays of Ancient Rome (1842), an attempt to reproduce the lost popular ballads of the Romans, which to the present day has retained considerable popularity and is not without poetical merit.

37

THE IMPEACHMENT OF LORD CLIVE.
[From 'The Edinburgh Review', January 1840]

The great events which had taken place in India had called into existence a new class of Englishmen, to whom their countrymen gave the 5 name of Nabobs. These persons had generally sprung from families neither ancient nor opulent; they had generally been sent at an early age to the East; and they had there acquired 10 large fortunes, which they had brought back to their native land. It was natural that, not having had much opportunity of mixing with the best society, they should exhibit some of 15 the awkwardness and some of the pomposity of upstarts. It was natural that, during their sojourn in Asia, they should have acquired some tastes and habits surprising, if not disgust20 ing, to persons who never had quitted Europe. It was natural that, having enjoyed great consideration in the East, they should not be disposed to sink into obscurity at home; and as 25 they had money, and had not birth or high connexion, it was natural that they should display a little obtrusively the single advantage which they possessed. Wherever they settled 30 there was a kind of feud between them and the old nobility and gentry, similar to that which raged in France between the farmer-general and the marquis. This enmity to the aristo35 cracy long continued to distinguish the servants of the Company. More than twenty years after the time of which we are now speaking, Burke pronounced that among the Jacobins 40 might be reckoned 'the East Indians almost to a man, who cannot bear to find that their present importance does not bear a proportion to their wealth.'

[blocks in formation]
[ocr errors]

them had in the East displayed
eminent talents, and rendered great
services to the state; but at home
their talents were not shown to ad- 50
vantage, and their services were little
known. That they had sprung from
obscurity, that they had acquired great
wealth, that they exhibited it in-
solently, that they spent it extra- 55
vagantly, that they raised the price
of every thing in their neighbourhood,
from fresh eggs to rotten boroughs,
that their liveries outshone those of
dukes, that their coaches were finer 60
than that of the Lord Mayor, that
the examples of their large and ill-
governed households corrupted half
the servants in the country, that
some of them, with all their magni- 65
ficence, could not catch the tone of
good society, but, in spite of the stud
and the crowd of menials, of the
plate and the Dresden china, of the
venison and the Burgundy, were still 70
low men; these were things which
excited, both in the class from which
they had sprung and in the class
into which they attempted to force
themselves, the bitter aversion which 75
is the effect of mingled envy and
contempt. But when it was also
rumoured that the fortune which had
enabled its possessor to eclipse the
Lord-Lieutenant on the race-ground,
or to carry the county against the
head of a house as old as Domes-
day Book, had been accumulated by
violating public faith, by deposing
legitimate princes, by reducing whole 85
provinces to beggary, all the higher
and better as well as all the low
and evil parts of human nature were
stirred against the wretch who had
obtained by guilt and dishonour the 90
riches which he now lavished with
arrogant and inelegant profusion. The

unfortunate Nabob seemed to be made up of those foibles against which 95 comedy has pointed the most merciless ridicule, and of those crimes which have thrown the deepest gloom over tragedy, of Turcaret and Nero, of Monsieur Jourdain and Richard the 100 Third. A tempest of execration and derision, such as can be compared only to that outbreak of public feeling against the Puritans which took place at the time of the Restoration, 105 burst on the servants of the Company. The humane man was horrorstruck at the way in which they had got their money, the thrifty man at the way in which they spent it. The 110 dilettante sneered at their want of taste. The maccaroni black-balled them as vulgar fellows. Writers the most unlike in sentiment and style, Methodists and libertines, philosophers and 115 buffoons, were for once on the same side. It is hardly too much to say that, during a space of about thirty years, the whole lighter literature of England was coloured by the feel120 ings which we have described. Foote brought on the stage an Anglo-Indian chief, dissolute, ungenerous, and tyrannical, ashamed of the humble. friends of his youth, hating the aristo125 cracy, yet childishly eager to be numbered among them, squandering his wealth on pandars and flatterers, tricking out his chairmen with the most costly hothouse flowers, and 130 astounding the ignorant with jargon about rupees, lacs, and jaghires. Mackenzie, with more delicate humour, depicted a plain country family raised by the Indian acquisitions of one of 135 its members to sudden opulence, and exciting derision by an awkward mimicry of the manners of the great. Cowper, in that lofty expostulation which glows with the very spirit of 140 the Hebrew poets, placed the oppression of India foremost in the list

[ocr errors]

of those national crimes for which God had punished England with years of disastrous war, with discomfiture in her own seas, and with the 145 loss of her transatlantic empire. If any of our readers will take the trouble to search in the dusty recesses of circulating libraries for some novel published sixty years ago, the chance 150 is that the villain or sub-villain of the story will prove to be a savage old Nabob, with an immense fortune, a tawny complexion, a bad liver, and a worse heart.

155

Such, as far as we can now judge, was the feeling of the country respecting Nabobs in general. And Clive was eminently the Nabob, the ablest, the most celebrated, the highest in 160 rank, the highest in fortune, of all the fraternity. His wealth was exhibited in a manner which could not fail to excite odium. He lived with great magnificence in Berkeley Square. 165 He reared one palace in Shropshire

and another at Claremont. His parliamentary influence might vie with that of the greatest families. But in all this splendour and power 170 envy found something to sneer at. On some of his relations wealth and dignity seem to have sat as awkwardly as on Mackenzie's Margery Mushroom. Nor was he himself, 175 with all his great qualities, free from those weaknesses which the satirists of that age represented as characteristic of his whole class. In the field, indeed, his habits were remarkably 180 simple. He was constantly on horseback, was never seen but in his uniform, never wore silk, never entered a palanquin, and was content with the plainest fare. But when he was 185 no longer at the head of an army, he laid aside this Spartan temperance for the ostentatious luxury of a Sybarite. Though his person was ungraceful, and though his harsh 190

[ocr errors]

features were redeemed from vulgar ugliness only by their stern, dauntless, and commanding expression, he was fond of rich and gay clothing, 195 and replenished his wardrobe with absurd profusion. Sir John Malcolm gives us a letter worthy of Sir Matthew Mite, in which Clive orders 'two hundred shirts, the best and 200 finest that can be got for love or money'. A few follies of this description, grossly exaggerated by report, produced an unfavourable impression on the public mind. But this was 205 not the worst. Black stories, of which the greater part were pure inventions, were circulated touching his conduct in the East. He had to bear the whole odium, not only 210 of those bad acts to which he had once or twice stooped, but of all the bad acts of all the English in India, of bad acts committed when he was absent, nay, of bad acts which he 216 had manfully opposed and severely punished. The very abuses against which he had waged an honest, resolute, and successful war, were laid to his account. He was, in fact, 220 regarded as the personification of all the vices and weaknesses which the public, with or without reason, ascribed to the English adventurers in Asia. We have ourselves heard old men, 225 who knew nothing of his history, but who still retained the prejudices conceived in their youth, talk of him as an incarnate fiend. Johnson always held this language. Brown, whom 230 Clive employed to lay out his pleasure grounds, was amazed to see in the house of his noble employer a chest which had once been filled with gold from the treasury of Moorshedabad, 235 and could not understand how the conscience of the criminal could suffer him to sleep with such an object so near to his bedchamber. The peasantry of Surrey looked with mysterious

horror on the stately house which 240 was rising at Claremont, and whispered that the great wicked lord had ordered the walls to be made so thick in order to keep out the devil, who would one day carry him away bodily. 245 Among the gaping clowns who drank in this frightful story was a worthless ugly lad of the name of Hunt, since widely known as William Huntington, S. S.; and the superstition 250 which was strangely mingled with the knavery of that remarkable impostor seems to have derived no small nutriment from the tales which he heard of the life and character of 255 Clive.

In the mean time, the impulse which Clive had given to the administration of Bengal was constantly becoming fainter and fainter. His 200 policy was to a great extent abandoned; the abuses which he had suppressed began to revive; and at length the evils which a bad government had engendered were aggravated by 265 one of those fearful visitations which the best government cannot avert. In the summer of 1770, the rains failed; the earth was parched up; the tanks were empty; the rivers shrank within 270 their beds; and a famine, such as is known only in countries where every household depends for support on its own little patch of cultivation, filled the whole valley of the Ganges with 276 misery and death. Tender and delicate women, whose veils had never been lifted before the public gaze, came forth from the inner chambers in which Eastern jealousy had kept 280 watch over their beauty, threw themselves on the earth before the passersby, and, with loud wailings, implored a handful of rice for their children. The Hoogley every day rolled down 285 thousands of corpses close to the porticoes and gardens of the English conquerors. The very streets of Cal

cutta were blocked up by the dying 290 and the dead. The lean and feeble survivors had not energy enough to bear the bodies of their kindred to the funeral pile or to the holy river, or even to scare away the jackals 295 and vultures, who fed on human

remains in the face of day. The extent of the mortality was never ascertained; but it was popularly reckoned by millions. This melan300 choly intelligence added to the excitement which already prevailed in England on Indian subjects. The proprietors of East India stock were uneasy about their dividends. All 305 men of common humanity were touched by the calamities of our unhappy subjects; and indignation soon began to mingle itself with pity. It was rumoured that the Company's ser810 vants had created the famine by engrossing all the rice of the country; that they had sold grain for eight, ten, twelve times the price at which they had bought it; that one English 315 functionary who, the year before, was not worth a hundred guineas, had, during that season of misery, remitted sixty thousand pounds to London. These charges we believe 320 to have been unfounded. That servants of the Company had ventured, since Clive's departure, to deal in rice, is probable. That, if they dealt in rice, they must have gained by 325 the scarcity, is certain. But there

is no reason for thinking that they either produced or aggravated an evil which physical causes sufficiently explain. The outcry which was raised 330 against them on this occasion was, we suspect, as absurd as the imputations which, in times of dearth at home, were once thrown by statesmen and judges, and are still thrown 835 by two or three old women, on the corn factors. It was, however, so loud and so general that it appears

to have imposed even on an intellect raised so high above vulgar prejudices as that of Adam Smith. What was 340 still more extraordinary, these unhappy events greatly increased the unpopularity of Lord Clive. He had been some years in England when the famine took place. None of his 345 acts had the smallest tendency to produce such a calamity. If the servants of the Company had traded in rice, they had done so in direct contravention of the rule which he 350 had laid down, and, while in power, had resolutely enforced. But, in the eyes of his countrymen, he was, as we have said, the Nabob, the AngloIndian character personified; and, 355 while he was building and planting in Surrey, he was held responsible for all the effects of a dry season in Bengal.

Parliament had hitherto bestowed 360 very little attention on our Eastern possessions. Since the death of George the Second, a rapid succession of weak administrations, each of which was in turn flattered and 365 betrayed by the Court, had held the semblance of power. Intrigues in the palace, riots in the capital, and insurrectionary movements in the American colonies, had left the ad- 370 visers of the Crown little leisure to study Indian politics. When they did interfere, their interference was feeble and irresolute. Lord Chatham, indeed, during the short period of 375 his ascendancy in the councils of George the Third, had meditated a bold attack on the Company. But his plans were rendered abortive by the strange malady which about that 380 time began to overcloud his splendid genius.

At length, in 1772, it was generally felt that Parliament could no longer neglect the affairs of India. 385 The Government was stronger than

со

« ПретходнаНастави »