PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE INCOME ACCOUNT OF RAILWAYS IN THE UNITED STATES FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1899.
NoTE.—The report embraced in this appendix is published as a separate document.
Page.
ABSTRACT QUESTIONS ---------------------------------------------------- 223 AccIDENTS, RAILWAY ------------------------------------------------ 54–57, 62,63 ACT OF -
February 11, 1893------------ --------------------------------------- 74
March 2, 1898---------------------------------------------------- 50–54, 259
July 2, 1890---------------------------------------------------- 10, 14–19,67 Acts ANd DoINGs of THE GRAND TRUNK RY. Co. of CANADA, RE.----------- 127 ACT TO REGULATE COMMERCE
amendments recommended ----------------------------------------
appropriations and expenditures -- cases decided under, during year --
civil cases pending under-------------------------------------------- 4 classification.---------------------------------- 6, 7, 12–20,46, 47,48, 84,85 common control, management, or arrangement----------------------- 79,226 complaint---------------------------------------------------------- 226 covers both direct and indirect damages.------------------------------ 25 enforcement of.----------------------------------------------------- 5, 7 formal proceedings under------------------------------------------- inadequacy of.----------------------------------------------------- 5, 7, 20 measures to secure requirement with-------------------------------- 5, 7 office work under-------------------------------------------------- 49, 50 power of commission over rates------------------------------------ 20, 70, 72 practice------------------------ purpose of ------ rate cutting rebates ------------------------------------------------- 11, 45,46, 75, 76,236 reparation ------------------------------------------------ 25,46,47,234,237 section 1-------------------------------- 39,46,47,48,68, 70,71, 73,75,229,236 section 2-------------------------- 12, 21, 26, 34,43,46, 47,48, 76, 78,79,237,241 section 3---------------------------------------------------------- 21, 23, 29 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 39–42, 46,47, 48,66,68, 70, 71, 73, 75, 76, 79,80,235,239 section 4------------------- 27, 28–33,44, 45,46,47, 48,66,68, 69, 70,230, 233,237 section 5------------------------------------------------------ 10, 12, 22,229 section 6--------------------- 8 section 7----------------------------------------------------------- 38 section 9------------------------- -- 233 Section 10 - 73, 74,228 Section 12 Section 13 239 section 14---------------------------------------------------------- 230 section 15---------------------------------------------------------- 230 section 16---------------------------------------------------------- 230, 238 section 17---------------------------------------------------------- 238 section 21---------------------------------------------------------- 240 section 22---------------------------------------------------------- 43,240 self-incrimination -------------------------------------------------- 74, 75 uniform classification --------------------------------------------- 6, 8, 84,85 Violations---------------------------------------------------------- 45,46 ADVANCES IN FREIGHT RATES-------------------------------------- 7, 12, 20, 47,48 AGREEMENTS ---------------------------------------- --- 29, 67, 76, 79–81,223 ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN R. R. Co. ET AL., RE------------------------- 203 ALABAMA MIDLAND RY. Co. ET AL., Board of Trade of Troy v.------------------------------------------- 174 Interstate Commerce Commission v.------------------------------ 32,66, 69, 71
Page.
35, 36
46,47
ALFoRD v. CHICAGo, Rock Island AND PACIFIc Ry. Co 135
ALLEGED DISTURBANCE IN PASSENGER RATES BY CANADIAN PAcific Ry. Co., RE- 211
ALLEGED ExCESSIVE FREIGHT RATES AND CHARGEs on Food PRodUCTs, RE--- 141 ALLEGED UNLAwFUL chARGEs For THE TRANSPORTATION of coal, BY THE
Louisville AND NASH VILLE R. R. Co., RE ------------------------- 169
ALLEGED UNLAwFUL RATES AND PRACTICES IN THE TRANSPORTATION of cot- ToN BY THE KANSAs CITY, MEMPHis AND BIRMINGHAM R. R. Co. ET AL-, RE --------------- --------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42,213
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL RATES AND PRACTICES IN THE TRANspoRTATION of GRAIN AND GRAIN PRODUCTs BY THE Atchison, Topeka & SANTA FE Ry. Co.
ET AL-, RE-------------------------------------------------------- 193, 199 ALLEGED UNLAwFUL TRANSPORTATION CHARGES BY ILLINois CENTRAL R. R. Co., RB---------------------------------------------------------- 192 ALLEGED violations of THE ACT To REGULATE commeRCE BY THE St. Louis AND SAN FRANCISCO RY. Co---------------------------------------- 28, 218 ALLEGHENY WALLEY RY. Co. ET AL., Wolf BROTHERS v.------------------- 194 ALLEN ET AL. v. Carolina Midland Ry. Co. et al------------------------------------ 210 v. Louisville New Albany and Chicago R. R. Co ---------------------- 104 ALMANACS ---------------------------------------- 47 AMENDMENT 223 AMENDMENTs to the act ----------------- ------ - - - - - - - - - - - - recommendation of railroad commissioners AMERICAN WAREHOUSEMEN's Association v. ILLINois CENTRAL R. R. Co. ET AL- 208 AMERICUS, GA --------------------------------------------------------- 35, 36,37 ANDREws SoAP Co. v. PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI AND ST. Louis Ry. Co. ET AL- - - 140
ANNAPOLIs, WASHINGTON AND BALTIMORE R. R. Co. ET AL., IN RE ANokA, MINN---------------------------------------------------
ANTITRUST ACT -------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - commission can not enforce----------------------- official classification not contrary to --------------------------------- ANTHONY SALT Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co ----. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - v. St. Louis and San Franciseo Ry. Co ----------------------------- APPEAL FROM CoMMISSIONER OF PATENTS.-------------------------------- APPENDIX A -----------------------------------------------------------
- --- 277 APPLICATION OF CERTAIN RAILROAD COMPANIES FOR A FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE SAFETY
APPLIANCE ACT, RE- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50–54, 221, 237,259 APPLICATIONS FoR RELIEF FROM THE operation of THE FOURTH SECTION ---- 48,237 APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES OF THE COMMISSION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 87 ARKANSAS------------------------------------------------- -- - - - - - - - - - - 58, 74, 75 ARRANGEMENT--------------------------------------------- 223
ARRANGEMENTS, JOINT- ASBESTOS ARTICLES ------------------------------------------------------ Associated WHOLESALE GROCERs of St. Louis v. Missouri PACIFIC RY. Co--- 103
Association of AMERICAN RAILWAY Accounting OFFICERS 84 MANUFACTURERs, MERCHANTS, AND MILLERS ------------- - 9
ASSOCIATIONS, TRAFFIC---------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - 12–20
ATCHISON, Top EKA AND SANTA FE R. R. Co. ET AL. - Duncan v --------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 176 Freeman v.--------------------------------------------------------- 198 Gustin v----------------------------------------- - 37,217 Johnston-Larimer Dry Goods Co. v.---------------- - 191 Matthews v ------------ , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 165 Rice v --------------------------------------------------------- - - 146 San Bernardino Board of Trade v------------------------------------ 142
« ПретходнаНастави » |