 | 1915 - 1346 страница
...Justice Neill, in Railway v. Tirres, cited: "The question of negligence is one of law for the court only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the вате conclusion from them. A case should not be withdrawn from the jury unless the conclusion follows,... | |
 | 1922 - 956 страница
...158 Ala. 381, 388, 48 South. 93. Concisely stated, the question is one of law for the court only when the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion froui them, and for the jury when the state of facts is such that reasonable minds may fairly differ... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1892 - 760 страница
...surroundings of the particular case. When a given state of facts is such that reasonable men may fairly difler upon the question as to whether there was negligence...not, the determination of the matter is for the jury; but where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them, the question... | |
 | Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Edward Bell Green, Frank Dale, John Henry Burford, Robert Lee Williams, Matthew John Kane, Howard J. Parker, Charles Winfield Van Eaton - 1912 - 938 страница
...prudent men. under a similar state of affairs. When a given state of facts is such that reasonable men may fairly differ upon the question as to whether...negligence is ever considered as one of law for the court." See Sans Bois Coal Co. v. Jancu'ay, 22 Okla. 425, 99 Pac. 153 ; St. Louis & SFR Co. r. Copland, :>:5... | |
 | Oklahoma. Supreme Court, Edward Bell Green, Frank Dale, John Henry Burford, Robert Lee Williams, Matthew John Kane, Howard J. Parker, Charles Winfield Van Eaton - 1917 - 912 страница
...Wis. 524. Questions of negligence do not become questions of law, to be decided by the court, except where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them, and the case should not be withdrawn from the jury unless the conclusion follows, as a matter of law,... | |
 | 1894 - 922 страница
...railroad train. 2. When a given' state of facts is such that reasonable men may differ upon the question whether there was negligence or not, the determination of .the matter Is for the jury. 8. But, when the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw from them the same conclusion, —... | |
| |
When a given state of facts is such that reasonable men may fairly differ upon the question as to whether there was negligence or not, the determination of the matter is for the jury. It is only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw... 
