 No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate commerce shall be governed by a rule which divests them of that character at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case, it is not...  Albany Law Journal - Страница 291892Пуни преглед - О овој књизи
 | 1928 - 320 страница
...based his whole argument. The Supreme Court said : " No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...governed by a rule which divests them of that character " — interstate character — " at an earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case, there... | |
 | Bar Association of the State of Kansas - 1908 - 770 страница
...commerce, interfering with the existing state laws. 8. "No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain, designated subjects of interstate...the case, it is not within its competency to do so." (In re Rahrer, 140 US 545, 562.) Such are the contentions of the friends and opponents of this legislation.... | |
 | United States. U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on interstate commerce - 1934 - 46 страница
...State's laws. "No reason is perceived," said Mr. Chief Justice Fuller, "why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...earlier period of time than would otherwise be the case, « 135 rS 100, 10 Sup. Ct. 681, 31 L. ed. 128 (1890). « Ibid, at 109. 110, 113. * 26 Stnt. 313 (1890).... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1936 - 54 страница
...unssailable, since Congress has provided that the particular subjects of interstate commerce here involved 'shall be governed by a rule which divests them of...period of time than would otherwise be the case.' In Rahrer, swpra, p. 562, namely upon arrival and delivery." (Italics supplied.) If, as stated by the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1936 - 828 страница
...unassailable, since Congress has provided that the particular subjects of interstate commerce here involved "shall be governed by a rule which divests them of...period of time than would otherwise be the case," In re Rahrer, supra, p. 562, namely, upon arrival and delivery. If the power of Congress to remove... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1938 - 278 страница
...in dealing with such property." And on page 562, "No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...shall be governed by a rule which divests them of the character at an earlier date of time than would otherwise be the case, it is not within its competency... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1938 - 272 страница
...in dealing with such property." And on page 562, "No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...shall be governed by a rule which divests them of the character at an earlier date of time than would otherwise be the case, it is not within its competency... | |
 | 1916 - 1142 страница
...Chief Justice Fuller, speaking for the court, says: 'No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...otherwise be the case, it is not within its competency so to do.' Upon this hint, Congress acted by passing the WebbKenyon law, which does so divest intoxicating... | |
 | 1914 - 318 страница
...excerpt from the opinion of Chief Justice Fuller: "No reason is perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...the case, it is not within its competency to do so." So that while a bare reading of the statute involved in that case, together with a bare statement that... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1947 - 778 страница
...State laws in dealing with such property. * * * "No reason 1 perceived why, if Congress chooses to provide that certain designated subjects of interstate...at an earlier period of time than would otherwise he the case, it is not within its competency to do so. "The differences of opinion which have existed... | |
| |
