 | John Spencer Bassett, Edwin Mims, William Henry Glasson, William Preston Few, William Kenneth Boyd, William Hane Wannamaker - 1911 - 446 страница
...that in their opinion "a tribunal is already provided by the Constitution of the United States, towit, the Supreme Court, more eminently qualified from their...than any other tribunal which could be erected."* The following year, on the other hand, they declare the National Bank unconstitutional, and instruct senators... | |
 | Hjalte Rasmussen - 1986 - 590 страница
...provided by the Constitution of the United States (to- wit, the Supreme Court) more eminently qualified to decide the disputes aforesaid in an enlightened...impartial manner than any other tribunal which could be created. This attitude of Virginia in 1809 is especially noticeable in view of its leadership in attacks... | |
 | Leonard W. Levy - 462 страница
...replied that the Constitution provides such a tribunal, "the Supreme Court, more eminently qualified ... to decide the disputes aforesaid in an enlightened...manner, than any other tribunal which could be erected. (See United States v. Judge Peters, 1809.) The events connected with the Martin case persuaded Virginia... | |
 | Jean Edward Smith - 1998 - 788 страница
...provided by the Constitution of the United States (to wit, the Supreme Court) more eminently qualified to decide the disputes aforesaid in an enlightened...impartial manner than any other tribunal which could be created." See Warren, 1 Supreme Court 443. 42. New Jersey v. Wilson, 7 Cranch 164 (1812). 43. 1 Wheaton... | |
 | Keith E. Whittington - 2007 - 332 страница
...provided by the Constitution of the United States, to wit: the Supreme Court, more eminently qualified to decide the disputes aforesaid in an enlightened...impartial manner than any other tribunal which could be created." "Resolution of the Legislature of Pennsylvania, April 3, 1 809," in State Documents on Federal... | |
 | 1830 - 628 страница
...United States, by the appointment of an impartial tribunal to decide disputes between the States and the Federal Judiciary, have had the same under their consideration,...impartial manner, than any other tribunal which could be created. 'The members of the Supreme Court are selected from those in the United States, who are most... | |
| |
State and federal judiciary, have had the same under their consideration, and are of opinion that a tribunal is already provided by the constitution of the United States, to wit : The Supreme Court, more eminently qualified, from their habits and duties,... 
