 | 1921 - 582 страница
...unskillfulness or criminal intent of the defendant's engineer. She, the deceased, was bound to listen and to look, before attempting to cross the railroad track,...approaching train, and not to walk carelessly into the place of possible danger. Had she used her senses, she could not have failed both to hear and to... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1919 - 1154 страница
...employés in those particulars was no excuse for negligence on her part. She was bound to listen and to look, before attempting to cross the railroad track,...approaching train, and not to walk carelessly into the place of possible danger. Had she used her senses, she could not have failed both to hear and to... | |
 | 1907 - 564 страница
...employes in these particulars was no excuse for negligence on her part. She was bound to listen and to look, before attempting to cross the railroad track,...approaching train, and not to walk carelessly into the place of possible danger. Had she used her senses, she could not have failed both to hear and to... | |
 | 1907 - 560 страница
...employes in these particulars was no excuse for negligence on her part. She was bound to listen and to look, before attempting to cross the railroad track,...approaching train, and not to walk carelessly into the place of possible danger. Had she used her senses, flhe could not have failed both to hear and... | |
 | 1907 - 564 страница
...or criminal intent" of the defendant's engineer. . . . She, the deceased, was bound to listen and to look before attempting to cross the railroad track,...approaching train, and not to walk carelessly into places of possible danger. Had she used her senses she could not have failed to both hear and see that... | |
 | Alabama. Supreme Court - 1891 - 778 страница
...excuse for negligence on her part. She was bound to listen and to look, before attempting to cross the track, in order to avoid an approaching train, and not to walk carelessly into the place of possible danger. Had she used her senses, she could not have failed both to hear and see... | |
 | Kansas. Supreme Court, Elliot V. Banks, William Craw Webb, Asa Maxson Fitz Randolph, Gasper Christopher Clemens, Thomas Emmet Dewey, Llewellyn James Graham, Oscar Leopold Moore, Earl Hilton Hatcher, Howard Franklin McCue - 1903 - 956 страница
...negligence on her part. She was bound to listen and to look, before attempting to cross the railroad-track, in order to avoid an approaching train, and not to walk carelessly into the place of possible danger. Had she used her senses, she could not have failed both to hear and to... | |
| |
Had she used her senses, she could not have failed both to hear and to see the train which was coming. If she omitted to use them, and walked thoughtlessly upon the track, she was guilty of culpable negligence, and so far contributed to... 
